Contrasting Multiple Choice and Cloze Task on Student’s Reading Comprehension
(1) UNIVERSITAS INDRAPRASTA PGRI
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The objective of this research is to obtain an empirical data about contrasting student’s reading comprehension by using two types of tests: Multiple Choice and Cloze Task. The research type was a comparative descriptive method. The subject consisted of 30 students of the fourth semester of English Department at University of Indraprasta PGRI in 2015-2016 academic year. The research data were collected by using pre-test and post-test. The result of data cultivation identified that based on test by using Multiple Choice, the average score (mean) was 69.3, median was 64.49, mode was 62.1, and deviation standard was 13.40. Whereas Cloze Task mean was 55.6, median was 52.86, mode was 50, and deviation standard was 9.97. On the basis of hypothesis test, ttest 15.56 was higher than ttable 1.67. It assumed that the significance result both Multiple Choice and Cloze Task are different (contrastive), in which student’s reading comprehension by Multiple Choice was higher than Cloze Task.
Keywords:Multiple Choice, Cloze Task, Student’s Reading Comprehension
Full Text:
PDF (ENGLISH)References
Brown, H.D. (2004). Languange Assesment Principles and
Classroom Practice. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Dubay, W. H. (2004). The Principles of Readability. Costa Mesta: CA.
Pramono, S. (2014). Panduan Evaluasi Kegiatan Belajar-Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.
Uno, H.B. (2014). Perencanaan Pembelajaran.Jakarta: PT.Bumi Aksara.
Uno, H.B. dan Satria K. (2014). Assesment Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Ratnawulan, E. dan Rusdiana, H.A. (2015). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.
Sejnost, R. L., dan Thiese, S. (2007). Creating the framework for reading. In Reading and writing across content areas. (2nd ed., pp. 1-35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
https://bintangsitepu.wordpress.com accessed on April 23rd 2016, 20.00 WIB
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/deiksis.v9i03.704
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Elyza Martiarini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Publisher: Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Address: Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. |
|
Deiksis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |