The Role Of Lecturer’s Characteristics Towards Students’ Motivations at Indraprasta Pgri University
(1) Pusat Penelitian Bidang Bahasa dan Seni Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(2)
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The purposes of the research was to investigate the significant role of lecturer’s characteristics both verbal and non-verbal towards students’ motivation in Indraprasta PGRI University. The students were in the third year (semester six) during a period of two months in which this study was conducted. The researchers used survey method in this study. Data collection were conducted by distributing questionnaires both to lecturers and students. The data were processed and analyzed by using statistic descriptive, normality test, linearity test, homogenity test, and hypotheses test. Statistic test uses t test and F test. The research was conducted from second week of March until fourth week of June 2015. The research shows that there is not an effect of lecturer’s characteristics towards students’ motivation with the regression analisis: Y= 43,923 + 0.322 X. Whenever there is a rise in the value of lecturer’s characteristics, there will be a decrease in students’ motivation for 0.322.
Key words: lecturer’s characteristics, students’ motivation
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Angelo, T., and Cross, P. 1993. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. (2nd ed.),San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fraenkel, Jack R. Norman E. Wallen. 2009. How to Design and Evaluate Research In Education: 7th Edition. San Fransisco State University.
Harmer, Jeremy. 1997. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Longman.
http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/11834.pdf. Research in Higher Education Journal Five key ingredients, Page 6 (accessed on March 6th, 2015)
http://www.teachthought.com/teaching/8-characteristics-of-a-great-teacher/. (accessed on March 6th, 2015).
Humanities & Social Sciences, 58(8-A), February, 3002.
Marilla D. Sviniciki. 2005. Students Goal Orientation, Motivation, and Learning. The IDEA Center Manhattan, Kansas. http://ideaedu.org/sites/default/files/Idea_Paper_41.pdf (accessed on March 5th, 2015)
Maxwell, J.A. 1996. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. California: Sage Publication, Inc. page. 20.
McCombs, B. 1991. Motivation and Lifelong Learning. In Educational Psychologist. 26 (3 & 4), 117-127 http://web.stanford.edu/dept/CTL/cgibin/docs/newsletter/motivation_to_learn.pdf (accessed on March 6th, 2015)
Montalvo, G. P. (1998). Pleasing the Teacher. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A:
Nilson. 2010. Strategies For Increasing Students’ Motivations. Adapted from Teaching at Its Best. http://www.crlt.umich.edu/sites/default/files/resource_files/Nilson-adaptedmotivation.pdf (accessed on March 5th, 2015)
Sugiyono. 2012. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Usman, Husnaini, Purnomo Setiady Akbar. 2006. Pengantar statistika 2. Bumi Aksara
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/deiksis.v8i01.665
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Nurhayati Nurhayati, Tri Angkarini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
| Publisher: Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Address: Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. |
|
 Deiksis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |