Mocking Women’s Social Judgment in Victorian Era Using Satire Language Style in Pride and Prejudice

Yulia Sofiani Zaimar(1*), Ajeng Dinar Wisesa Wardhani(2)

(1) UNIVERSITAS INDRAPRASTA PGRI
(2) UNIVERSITAS INDRAPRASTA PGRI
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This paper offers ironic language style overview of the satire in Pride and Prejudice Novel, cerated by Jane Austen. The Pride and Prejudice novel, which was written in Victorian Era, had brought many changes. It was the first England novels, written by a woman. The novels became  interesting, because it contains many satire inside, connecting the atmosphere in Victorian era. Austen was well known for the use of satire and was often pointed to feminist tendencies within her work, which provided a gap worthy of research as there were several studies concerning Austen’s use of satire and existence of feminism in Pride and Prejudice separately, but not as inter-related elements. The method, used in this research is a method that take the paragraph show the ironic language style, containing satire..The result showed that there is language style of satire, like as language criticsm and language of mockery. In addition, there is social value, which  was coordination and cooperation, were found. Humors have been found everywhere in the novel; in its words devine imagery, but mostly in its conversations between characters. Her novels were not only her way of entertaining people but it was also a way to express her opinions and views on what surrounded her and affected her.
 
KeyWord: Woman writter, Irony, Satire, and Victorian Era

Full Text:

PDF (ENGLISH)

References


Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogical Imagination. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Barker, C. (2008). Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice, SAGE Publications.

Bartens, H. (2001). Literary theory. New York: Routledge.

Byrne, P. (2013). The Real Jane Austen: A life in Small Things. New York: Harper Collins.

Goody, J. (1977). The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Griffin, D. (1994). Satire: A Critical Reintroduction. University Press of Kentucky.

Hughes, D. (2001). Marriage and Family. Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA.

Northrop, F. (1974). Anatomy of Criticism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Paul, R and Hubert, D., Foucault, M. (1984). Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, (2nd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Austen seemshttp://eu.wiley.com/Wiley CDA/WileyTitle/productCd0470008296.html, ISBN: 978-0470-00829-4

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social (Psychology, 51, 11731182. http://moodle.f.bg.ac.rs/fil e.php/48/Hayes2009.pdf)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/deiksis.v10i01.2096

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Yulia Sofiani Zaimar, Ajeng Dinar Wisesa Wardhani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  Publisher:
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Address: Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. 
Phone: +62 (021) 7818718 – 78835283 | Close in sunday and public holidays in Indonesia
Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM
Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm. 


  Creative Commons License
Deiksis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.